Young v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of aggravated kidnapping; the punishment is imprisonment for 10 years.
The appellant contends the trial court erred in finding him guilty in reliance on a stipulation that did not meet the requirements of Article 1.15 V.A.C.C.P. This Court has consistently held that compliance with this statute is mandatory for a stipulation to be considered as evidence. Valdez v. State, 555 S.W.2d 463 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Hughes v. State, 533 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).
Article 1.15 V.A.C.C.P. provides:
“... The evidence may be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte DuranCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte FeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Valdez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ybarra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Messer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Stewart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- McClain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.