McClain v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TEAGUE, Judge.
On direct appeal, the First Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, see McClain and Navarro v. State, Nos. 01-83-0477-CR and 01-83-0478-CR, respectively, May 3, 1984, relying exclusively upon this Court's panel opinion of Casey v. State, 633 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), reversed the convictions of Craig Houston McClain and Charles Vincent Navarro, hereinafter referred to as appellants, after finding that the evidence was insufficient because there was no proof under the State’s theory that was alleged in each…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- McClain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ybarra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Stewart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- Zinger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Parks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.