United States v. One Distillery
Supreme Court of the United States
error to the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of california. The statement of the case will be found in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
This was an information filed November 13, 1888, in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California to obtain a decree declaring that certain real and personal property which had been seized by a Collector of-Internal Be venue was forfeited to the United States.
The information was based upon sections 3257, 3281, 3305, 3453 and 3456 of the Bevised Statutes.
The property in question once belonged to the Fruitvale Wine and Fruit Company, a corporation of California. The acts that were set forth as constituting the grounds of forfeit ure were committed, if at all,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. County of San Luis ObispoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Stout v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lemm v. Northern California Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. About 151.682 Acres of Land in McHenry CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.