Legal Opinion

Richard Douglas Furnish v. The Board of Medical Examiners of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1958No. 15835_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a physician and surgeon duly licensed for many years to practice his profession in California, in 1953 entered a plea of nolo contendere to two counts of violating Title 26 U.S.C. § 145(b) (I.R.C. 1939). The indictment had charged him in three counts of wilfully and knowingly attempting to defeat and evade his income tax in the years 1946, 1947 and 1948 by filing false and fraudulent returns. Appellant entered a not guilty plea to Count I and nolo contendere to Counts II and III. Count I was dismissed after sentence on the second and third counts. The sentence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hill v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. H. J. Heinz Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Sexton v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Clark v. MemoloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. GittlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Sperry Rand Corporation v. Bernard J. RothleinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Chaffee v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964
  5. Drexler v. WaltersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API