Crouse v. North American Aviation, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
While in this case a motion to remand has not been filed, yet, because of decisions heretofore rendered in similar cases, it seems proper for the court of its own motion to take up the question of remanding the case.
The action is brought under paragraph (b) of Section 216, Title 29 U.S.C.A. It is there provided: “Action to recover such liability may be maintained in any court of competent jurisdiction by any one or more employees for and in behalf of, himself or themselves and other employees similarly situated, * *
Unfortunately there are no controlling decisions from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Owens v. Greenville News-PiedmontDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942
- Wingate v. General Auto Parts Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Olson v. REMBRANDT PRINTING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1974
- McGuire v. North American Aviation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1946