Legal Opinion

Little Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. Sandy City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2016No. Case No. 20150305PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Justice Durham,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 In 1910, the district court issued the Little Cottonwood Morse Decree, which established water rights for the Little Cottonwood Creek. The decree also terminated a contract that conferred a right to use a portion of this water. The Morse Decree replaced the terminated contract with new terms that govern this contractual right to use the water. The decree provides that the water may be diverted and used so long as monthly payments of seventy-five dollars are remitted to the owners of the water rights.

¶2 In 2013, several parties…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Albert Lapin and Lapinal, Inc. v. Shulton, Inc., and Tecnique, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake City Water & Electrical Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Swallow v. JessopUtah Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MetUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Fisher v. DavidhizarCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Utah State Legislature v. League of WomenUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Ahmad v. Graco FishingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. Allen Family Trust v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API