Legal Opinion

Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided June 28, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00337Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SEAGEN INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00337-JRG § DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s (“DSC”) Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 22) and Motion to Transfer Under

28 U.S.C. § 1404

to the District of Delaware (the “Motion to Transfer”). Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”) opposes both motions.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API