Legal Opinion
In re Hughes
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 18, 1999No. Bankruptcy No. 99-40302Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTORS’ ADDITIONAL PERSONAL PROPERTY EXEMPTION CLAIM
IRVIN N. HOYT, Chief Judge.
The matter before the Court is Trustee John S. Lovald’s July 23, 1999 objection to Debtors’ amended schedule of exempt property. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). This Memorandum of Decision and accompanying Order shall constitute the Court’s findings and conclusions under F.R.Bankr.P. 7052(a). As set forth below, the Court concludes that the Trustee’s objection must be sustained.
I
Jessie J. and Carroll L. Hughes (Debtors) filed a Chapter 7…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Ryd WALLERSTEDT and Colleen Wallerstedt, Debtors. Ryd WALLERSTEDT and Colleen Wallerstedt, Appellees, v. David A. SOSNE, Trustee, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. Herman (In Re Herman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Electrical and Magneto Service Co. Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Ambac International Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Accounts Management, Inc. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Mueller v. Buckley (In Re Mueller)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.