Rickard v. Burton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Richard Rickard, a pro se Kentucky prisoner, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Requesting monetary and injunctive relief, Rickard sued a state court clerk, a Commonwealth’s Attorney, the state At*470torney General, and the Kentucky Governor in their official capacities, alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Melda Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robert C. Bransford v. Robert Brown Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Theodore Ruark v. Frank Gunter, Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. StoverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hardrick v. 36th District CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Jackson v. ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Jeffery Robertson v. State of Tennessee, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Rose v. Wayne CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019