Legal Opinion

Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Shipman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1889No. 12100PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Oourt of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an action to enjoin the enforcement of a decree for the sale of certain real estate in the city of San Francisco for the satisfaction of a street assessment, upon the ground that the plaintiff was at the time the action was brought and the decree rendered the owner of the property, and not having been made a party to the suit, the judgment as against it was void.

There was a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled, and upon a trial by the court, a perpetual injunction was decreed.

This is the second time the case has been to this court on appeal. At the former hearing it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cook v. . TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. McCarthy v. NicrosiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Weston v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reid v. BarrySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Lee v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Little Rock v. LinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Peter v. StephensMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. County of San Luis Obispo v. AshurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API