Legal Opinion
Kohlbeck v. Reliance Const. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 9, 2002No. 01-1404PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
¶ 1. Jill and Jeffrey Kohlbeck sued the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) and Reliance Construction Company, Inc., alleging that a highway construction project supervised by DOT and performed by Reliance damaged their property. DOT filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The circuit court granted the motion, concluding alternatively that the Kohlbecks could not state a claim under Wxs. Stat. § 88.87 (1999-2000) 1 because they had failed to ask for equitable relief in their complaint and because, regardless of the sufficiency of their complaint, they had an adequate…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Wilson v. Continental Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boyer v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Tri City National Bank v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Scott N. Waller v. American Transmission Company, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Southport Commons, LLC v. DOTWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Allen Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.