Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jackson v. Allen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1992No. 91-1343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In his first proposition of law, Allen argues that Jackson is attempting to substitute this quo warranto action for the appeal of the trial court’s order overruling Whitman’s motion to dismiss his indictments. Jackson responds that he only challenges the right of Allen to hold the office of special prosecutor and that this action should not be construed as a substitute for an appeal.

Quo warranto relief is not available if a statutory appeal procedure exists. State ex rel. Hanley v. Roberts (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 1, 4, 17 OBR 1, 3, 476 N.E.2d 1019. 1021-1022.

*39In the underlying criminal cases,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Luna v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. TalikkaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McElhaney v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Luna v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gibson v. Wilson, 08ca85 (2-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API