Legal Opinion
Coffee Dan's, Inc. v. Coffee Don's Charcoal Broiler
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 22, 1969No. 51858PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OPINION AND ORDER
GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338, plaintiff sues for alleged infringement by defendant of the service mark, “Coffee Dan’s” registered under the laws of the United States (15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127), for alleged unfair competition by defendant, and for an injunction, damages and accounting.
Plaintiff Coffee Dan’s, Inc., (“Coffee Dan’s”) is a California corporation having a place of business at 8447 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California. The service mark has been used by Coffee Dan’s in California since 1945 and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Dymo Industries, Inc. v. Tapeprinter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Clairol Incorporated v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Sardi's Restaurant Corporation, Sardi's Restaurant Services, Inc., and Vincent Sardi v. Lyle Sardie and Western Pubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Toho Company, Ltd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Toho Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sykes Laboratory, Inc. v. KalvinDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.