Legal Opinion

Gilfus v. McNally Capital, LLC.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 17, 2023No. 8:18-cv-02941Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ARTHUR GILFUS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:18-cv-2941-CEH-CPT MCNALLY CAPITAL, LLC., Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. 169). In the motion, Defendant requests the Court enter an order striking Plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial because the only claim remaining to be tried is the equitable claim of unjust enrichment. Plaintiff responded in opposition (Doc. 188) and Defendant replied (Doc. 191). The issue of Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. PTA-FLA, Inc. v. ZTE USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Deemer v. Hallett Pontiac, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Alvarez v. PuleoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API