Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Puleo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 16, 1990No. 89-01827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Julio and Barbara Alvarez and James and Rose Alvarez, the plaintiffs below, contest a final judgment in which the trial court granted Phillip Puleo and Samuel Bis-sett’s motion for involuntary dismissal of the Alvarezes’ complaint. We reverse and remand for a new trial on the ground that the trial court erroneously required appellants to elect their remedy prior to the beginning of trial.

On the day trial was to begin, upon appellees’ motion the court informed appellants that they had to choose going forward on Count I of their complaint, a request that the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barbe v. VilleneuveSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Deemer v. Hallett Pontiac, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Parsons v. Motor Homes of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Monco of Orlando v. ITT INDUS. CREDITDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. De Pantosa Saenz v. Rigau & Rigau, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burr v. NorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Gilfus v. McNally Capital, LLC.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
  3. Newman v. American Home Assurance Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API