Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 19, 1983No. 83 Civ. 0757 (GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
This is an action by Carol Reynolds against the New York State Department of Corrections and the New York State Department of Civil Service. She alleges that, for approximately eight months in 1976, the defendants discriminated against her on the basis of her sex and thus violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Before this Court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the ground of res judicata.
The facts relevant to this motion are not in dispute. In 1976, the plaintiff filed complaints against the state defendants with the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Celio DIAZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Pugh v. LockeDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wakeen v. Hoffman House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- McNasby v. Crown Cork & Seal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1476, 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1816, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,977 Wayne Wakeen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Hoffman House, Inc., Hoffman House Restaurants, Inc., and the Pillsbury CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984