Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Locke

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided January 13, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-203-N, 74-57-NPublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

In these consolidated class actions, 1 plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of their Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 2201 and 2202. This Court, as authorized by Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, incorporates in this memorandum opinion the appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The Court finds that these actions are maintainable as class actions under Federal Rule 23(a) and (b)(2). The class is composed of all…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Bowring v. GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. Spencer Harris v. Ronald Fleming, Larry Frailey and Walter BreischkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API