Legal Opinion

Heilbron v. 76 Land & Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1892No. 14460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order refusing to amend it. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

plaintiffs commenced this action in the superior court of Tulare County to obtain a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from diverting any of the waters of Kings Eiver into and through a certain canal constructed and owned by defendant. After trial the court granted the injunction as prayed for, and “further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said defendant forthwith fill up the head of its said canal where it connects with the channel of said Kings Eiver, and close the same so that no water can or will flow from said river into defendant’s said canal.” From .this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Heilbron v. 76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Watterson v. SaldunbehereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. S&J Logistics, Inc. v. United National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API