Silverman, Lindauer & Co. v. Kuhn
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Pollc Gvrouit Court. The plaintiffs filed in the Polk Circuit Court a petition as follows: “Paragraph 1. Plaintiffs state that they are partners, doing business under the firm name of Silverman, Lindauer & Co.; that said Isaac Kuhn, one of the above named defendants, is indebted to them in the sum of $787.59, for goods and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant Isaac Kuhn.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, Pollc Gvrouit Court. The plaintiffs filed in the Polk Circuit Court a petition as follows: “Paragraph 1. Plaintiffs state that they are partners, doing business under the firm name of Silverman, Lindauer & Co.; that said Isaac Kuhn, one of the above named defendants, is indebted to them in the sum of $787.59, for goods and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant Isaac Kuhn. “Par. 2. That prior to the 22nd day of April, 1879, said defendant Isaac Kuhn was a merchant carrying on business at Des Moines, Iowa, and was the owner, and in possession, of a large stock…
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
i bbobiveb • offsiwwhíg requisite. J. Counsel have argued elaborately the questions as to whether the plaintiffs, not being judgment creditors, are im(Jer any circumstances entitled -to a receiver; and whether- they have such lien upon, or interest ^ the mortgaged properly as to entitle them to a receiver. In the view which we take of the case we do not deem it necessary to determine these questions. As before stated, the application for appointment of a receiver was based *451solely upon the petition and answers, and the record in the law action against Isaac Kuhn. The answers deny in positive…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hughes v. CorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sweet, Dempster & Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Maish v. BirdU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1882