Legal Opinion

Maish v. Bird

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa

Decided August 15, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit to foreclose a chattel mortgage. On motion to remand to the state court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCrary, J.

Maish, the holder and owner of a mortgage executed by Bird, brought his suit in a state court to foreclose the same, making Morrison, Harriman <fe Co. defendants, on the ground that they claimed an interest in the mortgaged property. Maish and Bird are citizens of Iowa, and Morrison, Harriman & Co. citizens of Hew York. The latter appeared and filed a cross-hill, alleging that the mortgage sued on is fraudulent and void, and praying a decree to set it aside; and thereupon they petitioned the state court for a removal of the cause to this court, on the ground that, under their cross-bill,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Ayers v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Mooar v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. White v. GriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Donohoe v. Mariposa Land & Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fountain v. 624 Pieces of TimberDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API