Trustees System Co. v. Stoll

Pkr Curiam.

This action was brought against Charles E. Stoll (hereinafter called the defendant), one of the co-makers of a promissory note given to the plaintiff, in accordance with the Small Loan act. Pamph. L. 1932, ch. 62; N. J. Stat. Annual 1932, p. 48, §§ 35-22 to 35-49. The judge of the District Court, sitting without a jury, gave judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendant (appellant) urges that the trial court erred in denying his motion for the direction of a verdict, and the determination of that question will in effect dispose of every question argued.

It is first urged in support of…