Legal Opinion

Bollerer v. George & Lucille Elenberger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 4, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Proctor, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The Division of Compensation dismissed the claimant’s petition. The sole ground for the dismissal was a finding that the employer neither was given notice nor had knowledge of the claimed compensable injury within 90 days as required by N. J. 8. A. 34:15-17. On appeal, the County Court held that the employer had knowledge of the injury suffi eient to satisfy the statute. Though the Division had not decided the issue of causal relationship, the County Court determined that the injury was causally related…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Panchak v. Simmons Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Handleman v. Marwen Stores Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Robinson v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Pagano v. Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Brock v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELEC. & GASNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Handleman v. Marwen Stores Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API