Holman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM BASS, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of attempted murder and assessed punishment at five years confinement. This court originally sustained appellant’s contention that the jury charge was fundamentally defective and reversed his conviction. Subsequent to our opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals decided Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 160 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) (op. on reh’g), and, in an unpublished opinion, remanded this cause for reconsideration under the standards set out in Almanza. Applying those standards, we affirm.
In his first ground of error, appellant contends that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stancliff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Stancliff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Kolar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Marlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Pierce, Daniel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002