Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernstein
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 20, 1957No. Civ. A. 3088Published
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff instituted this action by filing a complaint charging the defendants with having engaged, in violation of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 1611 et seq., in a fraudulent trick, scheme, or device for the purpose of obtaining, or aiding in obtaining surplus property from the War Assets Administration.
The case was tried to the Court and thereafter briefs were submitted by the parties.
On plaintiff’s motion, at the conclusion -of its case the action was dismissed as -against the defendant Abe Bernstein.
As to the defendant Rose Levy, the Court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Vestal v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Esther Goldstein v. United States of America, Jack Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.