In re the Detention of Halgren
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
f 1 Pursuant to the sexually violent predators act (SVPA), chapter 71.09 RCW, the trial court ordered the involuntary commitment of petitioner Michael Halgren after a unanimous jury found beyond a reasonable doubt that Halgren was a sexually violent predator (SVP). Halgren appealed the commitment to Division One of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court in all respects. We accepted review of three issues addressed by Division One and hold that the trial court did not err in admitting Dr. Robert Wheeler’s testimony or in declining to give Halgren’s proposed unanimity instruction…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Detention of StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SweanyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Detention of MorganWashington Supreme Court · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.