Legal Opinion
In Re Hurst
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 9, 1999No. 19-12197PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSTAINING, IN PART, TRUSTEE’S SECOND OBJECTION TO PROPERTY CLAIMED AS EXEMPT
E. STEPHEN DERBY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the court is the Trustee’s Second Objection to Property Claimed as Exempt. The debtors, Samuel Leon Hurst and Carol Lee Hurst (“Debtors”), have claimed a personal injury claim of Ms. Hurst as exempt. The issue the court must resolve is whether lost wages can properly be exempted under Maryland’s personal injury exemption. Because the court concludes that lost wages may not be exempted, the objection will be sustained.
Certain facts are not in dispute. Ms.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Curran v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Lester v. Storey (In Re Lester)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- In Re TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- In Re ButcherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Calafiore v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- In Re HarringtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- In Re JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- In Re SheeranUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Wolff v. Gibson (In re Gibson)District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.