Legal Opinion

Seal Lock Co. v. Chicago Manufacturing & Optical Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, for goods sold. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Appellee recovered judgment against appellant, in an action of assumpsit, for the sum of $502, from which judgment this appeal was taken.

The declaration contains the common counts, including a count on account stated.

The following letters were written by appellee to appellant :

“ Chicago, April 23, 1900.

Chicago Meg. & Optical Co.,

18-30 W. Eandolph St., City.

Gentlemen — We hereby desire you to make for us a duplicate of our previous order for 25,000 parts for our O. K. lamp, called the O. JL 1900, same to be subject to our Mr. John Schumacher’s supervision and approval, and if he should desire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Brewer & Hofmann Brewing Co. v. HermannIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Auerbach v. ArguellesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shane v. De LeonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  2. Clifford v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API