Pete v. Quality Construction Specialists & Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
| defendant-appellants, Quality Construction Specialists and Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company, assert that the Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC) was manifestly erroneous by finding that (1) Quality’s employee, Roshawn Pete, proved he had a job-related accident, and (2) Pete was entitled to penalties and attorney fees. Pete answers the appeal, requesting attorney fees for the work on this appeal and asking this court to amend the OWC’s judgment as it contains a clerical error. For the following reasons, we amend the OWC’s judgment and, as amended, affirm.
I
ISSUE…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. GuilbeauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lambert v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Penn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Romero v. Garan's, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Brett Buckner v. Dialysis Clinics, Inc. (Dci)Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
- Damon W. Ryan v. Cajun Industries, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- Dena Romero v. Garan's, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Romero v. Garan's, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.