Legal Opinion

Bumpus v. American Central Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 12, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On motion by defendant. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for plaintiff for $532.95. Defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.

In this action on a fire insurance policy, the only question submitted to the jury, and the only one now to be considered *218by the court upon the defendant’s motion for a new trial, is, which one of the plaintiff’s two mill buildings was covered by the policy ?

The property of the plaintiff which was insured is described in the policy as "his one story frame, steel roof building situated on the north side of Bridge Street, and known on the map as Thurston’s Planing and Saw Mill, in Livermore Falls, Maine, privileged to be occupied as a Planing Mill and Job Shop.”

The plaintiff had two "one story…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolff v. National Liberty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API