Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1947No. 32295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

Defendant was convicted on an information charging that he did forcibly break and enter a motor vehicle with the intent to steal therefrom property of value contained within the motor vehicle. He brings proceedings in error to reverse his conviction.

Section 28-531.02, R. S. 1943, provides in part: “Every person who shall break and enter, or enter without breaking, at any time, any motor vehicle, with intent to commit the crime of larceny, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, * *

The first question raised is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.

There is evidence in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goldsberry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sedlacek v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Metz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Commonwealth v. BraileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Balis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Grandsinger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Pulliam v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Yost v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API