Sledge v. Law
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
Essential to the liability of the head of a family under the family purpose automobile doctrine is the fact that *747the head of the family has supplied the vehicle for the use of one or other members of the family. Ferguson v. Gurley, 218 Ga. 276, 280 (127 SE2d 462); Durden v. Maddox, 73 Ga. App. 491 (37 SE2d 219); Studdard v. Turner, 91 Ga. App. 318, 321 (85 SE2d 537). The fact that a mother made financial arrangements and signed notes to enable a minor son to purchase an automobile was held insufficient alone to create liability of the mother. Jenkins v. Bridges, 93 Ga. App. 241…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hubert v. HarpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Durden v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Ferguson v. GurleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Baker v. ShockeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Pouliot v. BoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Calhoun v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Finnocchio v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- James v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.