Legal Opinion

Sledge v. Law

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1966No. 41887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

Essential to the liability of the head of a family under the family purpose automobile doctrine is the fact that *747the head of the family has supplied the vehicle for the use of one or other members of the family. Ferguson v. Gurley, 218 Ga. 276, 280 (127 SE2d 462); Durden v. Maddox, 73 Ga. App. 491 (37 SE2d 219); Studdard v. Turner, 91 Ga. App. 318, 321 (85 SE2d 537). The fact that a mother made financial arrangements and signed notes to enable a minor son to purchase an automobile was held insufficient alone to create liability of the mother. Jenkins v. Bridges, 93 Ga. App. 241…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubert v. HarpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Durden v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Ferguson v. GurleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Baker v. ShockeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Pouliot v. BoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Calhoun v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Finnocchio v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. James v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API