Legal Opinion
Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1995No. Nos. 94-3855, 94-3973, 94-4280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
In case numbers 94-3855/3973, defendant/appellant the City of Cincinnati (“the City”), and intervening defendants/appellants Equal Rights Not Special Rights (“ERNSR”), Mark Miller, Thomas E. Brink-man, Jr., and Albert Moore, challenged the lower court’s invalidation of, and permanent injunction restraining implementation of, an amendment to the City Charter of Cincinnati (“the Charter”) denominated “Issue 3” which was enacted by popular vote on November 2, 1993 and which then became Article XII of the Charter (“the Amendment”), for purported constitutional…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spies v. VoinovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Pedersen v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Polaris Amphitheater Concerts, Inc. v. City of WestervilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Equality Foundation Of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City Of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.