Legal Opinion

Lambert v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1989No. 3-89-100-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found appellant guilty of indecency with a child and assessed punishment, enhanced by two previous felony convictions, at imprisonment for thirty years. Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 21.11 (1989).

Appellant’s single point of error is that the State failed to adequately prove one of the two previous convictions used for enhancement. Both convictions were from Michigan, the one in question being Wayne County cause number 76-623691-FR. The State’s proof is in the form of a penitentiary packet, the admissibility of which appellant does not dispute. There is also no question that appellant is the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Thornton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Doby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruben Urrutia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  2. Ruben Urrutia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  3. Ted Allen Hamilton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API