Doby v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.
The offense is the unlawful possession of narcotic drugs; the punishment, enhanced under Art. 63 P.C., life.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is challenged, the first glound of error being predicated upon the contention that the jury’s verdict was based upon evidence obtained in violation of appellant’s constitutional rights as the result of an illegal arrest and search.
The record reflects the following: Two police officers of the City of Houston went to an apartment house in answer to a disturbance call. After a conversation with the…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Petruccelli v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Dunlap v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.