In Re United Railways & Electric Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
The court has given very careful consideration to the details of the plan as submitted by the bondholders’ committees for reorganization of the United Railways pursuant to section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 207), relating to corporate reorganizations. Lengthy hearings have been held after due notice to all bondholders, creditors of all classes, and all stockholders; in short, to all interested parties, to whom, at these hearings, full opportunity was afforded to object to the plan or any part of it, and to be heard fully.
To such objections as were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Public Service Commission v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- United Railways & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. McLanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Warren v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- In re United Railways & Electric Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- Brown v. McLanahanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944