Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1984No. B001474PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Nature of Proceedings:

Defendant in a criminal trial seeks prohibition to restrain his trial for burglary on the ground of double jeopardy. The trial court had declared a mistrial on the basis of legal necessity after excusing a juror who after trial had started said (1) he had prejudged defendant’s case and (2) that his mind kept wandering and he could not concentrate.

Facts:

On the day following the first witness’ testimony it was called to the court’s attention that juror Rodriguez had been exposed to the comments of a prospective juror (Lewis) who had been excused from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Larios v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re DevlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. McJimsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. HalseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. (HC) Becker v. AngleaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API