Mitchell v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
Nature of Proceedings:
Defendant in a criminal trial seeks prohibition to restrain his trial for burglary on the ground of double jeopardy. The trial court had declared a mistrial on the basis of legal necessity after excusing a juror who after trial had started said (1) he had prejudged defendant’s case and (2) that his mind kept wandering and he could not concentrate.
Facts:
On the day following the first witness’ testimony it was called to the court’s attention that juror Rodriguez had been exposed to the comments of a prospective juror (Lewis) who had been excused from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Larios v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re DevlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. McJimsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. HalseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- (HC) Becker v. AngleaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.