Legal Opinion

ConocoPhillips v. DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCES

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2005No. S-11131Published

1Opinion of the Court

109 P.3d 914 (2005)

CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxonmobil Alaska Production Inc., and Forest Oil Corporation, Appellants,

v.

STATE of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Appellee.

No. S-11131.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

January 28, 2005.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 2005.

Joseph J. Perkins, Jr., Guess & Rudd, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellants.

Leonard H. Herzog, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, and Gregg D. Renkes, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellee.

Before: BRYNER, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, FABE, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Arkla Exploration Co. v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API