Legal Opinion

Street Railway Co. v. Doyle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM SHELBY. . Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Action by Doyle, an abutting lot-owner, 'to recover damages from the East End Street Kailway Company for the alleged wrongful and unlawful construction and operation of its railway line along and upon the highway in front of his property. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and appeal in error by defendant.

On the trial below the defendant requested the trial Judge to instruct the jury as follows: “If the jury find that the defendant constructed its road through a part of the city to a point five miles into the country, in accordance with its contract with the city and county, road [its cars?]…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newell v. Minneapolis, Lyndale & Minnetonka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  2. Stewart v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. United Electric Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Diebold v. Kentucky Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Howe v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API