Legal Opinion

Newell v. Minneapolis, Lyndale & Minnetonka Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1886PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Plaintiff is owner of certain land abutting on a public street in Minneapolis called “First Avenue South,” and therefore owner of the fee of the half of the street adjoining his premises, subject to the street easement. As the complaint alleges, defendant— a railway corporation, and assuming to act as such — has wrongfully entered upon plaintiff’s portion of the street, and taken possession thereof for its road-bed, laying down ties and rails thereon, and using and continuing in possession thereof for the operation of its railway, all without plaintiff’s consent, and without payment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carli v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mordhurst v. Ft. Wayne & Southwestern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Howe v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Romer v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. L. Realty Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API