Freeman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
The defendant appeals his burglary conviction. Held:
1. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict and it was not error to overrule the defendant’s motion for directed verdict of acquittal.
2. It is urged ;that. certain questions propounded to a prosecution witness tended to elicit impermissible comment on the defendant’s right to remain silent. However, no objection was interposed to such testimony. Hence, this ground shows no reversible error. Tiller v. State, 238 Ga. 67(1) (230 SE2d 874); Alderman v. State, 241 Ga. 496, 504 (246 SE2d 642); Paschal v. State,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alderman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Burnett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Ponder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Paschal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Rutland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981