Legal Opinion

Miller v. Aaron

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1967No. 16886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellant W. C. Jack Miller appeals from a summary judgment in favor of ap-pellee George Aaron, upon a promissory note for $10,000, negotiable in form, dated February 8, 1964 and due August 1, 1965. The appellant filed a verified plea of nudum pactum.

By filing his motion for summary judgment under Rule 166-A, Vernon’s Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, appellee assumed the burden of showing the absence of any genuine issue as to any material fact and that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with all conflicts in the evidence being disregarded and the evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Alexander v. Houston Oil Field Material Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Citizens' Garage Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Henry S. Miller Co. v. Treo EnterprisesTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Guaranty Bank (South Oak Cliff Bank) v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Gaitz v. MarkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Miller v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API