Legal Opinion

McClaskey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 23, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

-Appellant was indicted- for disposing of

certain personal ¡property upon’ which ‘a mortgage lien existed.. Omitting the formal parts, the indictment reads as follows: “The said Otto McClaskey aforesaid, on the first day of January, 1924, did unlawfully, knowingly, and feloniously sell, barter, exchange and dispose of one 3" Bane log-wagons of the value of $150 and one Oakland automobile of the value of $150, all of the total" value of $300, upon which log-wagon and Oakland .automobile one J. W. McCormack.had a chattel mortgage -to secure -the payment of $82.90 due him by the .said Otto…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Spier v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  4. State v. HarbersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  5. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Hunt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McGraw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API