Legal Opinion

Hooper v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1933No. CR 3826PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is insisted that the court erred in refusing to give requested instructions Nos. 2 and 6, in the admission of certain testimony, in the refusal to discharge a panel of thirty special jurors; and that the testimony is insufficient to support the verdict, there being no testimony corroborating that of the accomplices.

Instruction No. 2 was sufficiently covered by the general instructions given calling attention particularly to a certain kind of testimony admitted about the facts, of which it was claimed the defendant had knowledge before the consummation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. York v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Wiley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. State v. RivenbarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Keese v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. State v. SheltonOhio Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API