Legal Opinion

Oxendine v. . Stephenson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe exceptions presented by defendant’s appeal are without special merit, and they will not be considered seriatim.

Tbe action is for damages, ratber than for specific performance, because, a,t tbe time of tbe institution of tbe suit, tbe defendant bad parted with title and conveyed tbe land to a third person.

While the authorities elsewhere are conflicting, it is the rule in this jurisdiction that when one, who has agreed orally to sell land, prepares and signs a, deed, which substantially expresses the bargain, and delivers the same in escrow, such writing is a sufficient memorandum to meet…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magee v. . BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Flowe v. . HartwickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Pope v. . McPhailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Vinson v. . PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Austin v. . McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API