Baker v. Fleming
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
On the fourteenth day of July, 1896, the appellant, A. E. Baker, sold and conveyed to S. J. Fleming and B. T. Tustin, by deed absolute, certain mining property situated in Yavapai County, receiving part of the purchase price thereof in cash and the written obligations of the said Fleming and Tustin for the residue. No express lien was reserved, however, for the unpaid portion of the purchase money. On or about the twentieth day of August, 1896, the Providence Gold Mining Company took a conveyance of said property from Fleming and Tustin, with full knowledge on its part of the existence of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Ahrend v. OdiorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Gilman v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. HinchmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1914
- Pima Farms Co. v. ElliottArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Watson v. Republic Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. HinchmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1914
- Fowlkes v. LeaMississippi Supreme Court · 1904