People v. Williams
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic
The issue in this case is whether the trial court’s statements in response to defendant’s motion for a finding of not guilty amounted to an acquittal for double jeopardy purposes. We hold that these statements did not constitute an acquittal.
FACTS
Defendant, Tracy Williams, and codefendant, Jamal Crumble, were charged with first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9 — 1 (West 1992)) and armed robbery (720 ILCS 5/18 — 2 (West 1992)). These charges arose out of the December 27, 1993, murder of Thomas Yednak. Defendant’s case was severed from his codefendant’s case, and defendant waived his right to a jury…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. BrookinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- People v. SangsterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.