Legal Opinion

In Matter of Petition of Featherfall Restoration

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 24, 2025No. 17o/24Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the Matter of the Petition of Featherfall Restoration, LLC, No. 17, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Gould, J. INSURANCE POLICIES ‒ CHOSE IN ACTION ‒ POST-LOSS ASSIGNMENTS – ANTI-ASSIGNMENT CLAUSE The Supreme Court of Maryland held that a post-loss claim for money payments under a policy is a chose in action, and, therefore, an assignable property right separate from the policy itself. Therefore, an insurance policy’s anti-assignment clause prohibiting assignments of “this policy” does not bar an assignment of a single post-loss claim under the policy. Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Washington Fire Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API