In Matter of Petition of Featherfall Restoration
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
In the Matter of the Petition of Featherfall Restoration, LLC, No. 17, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Gould, J. INSURANCE POLICIES ‒ CHOSE IN ACTION ‒ POST-LOSS ASSIGNMENTS – ANTI-ASSIGNMENT CLAUSE The Supreme Court of Maryland held that a post-loss claim for money payments under a policy is a chose in action, and, therefore, an assignable property right separate from the policy itself. Therefore, an insurance policy’s anti-assignment clause prohibiting assignments of “this policy” does not bar an assignment of a single post-loss claim under the policy. Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Washington Fire Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.