Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Aetna Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The plaintiff is the beneficiary named in a policy of accident insurance issued by the defendant which insured her husband “against loss resulting directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injuries effected . . . solely through accidental means” and provided that for loss of life thus caused the insurer would pay the plaintiff $15,000. The policy also contained the provision: “This insurance shall not cover accident, injury, disability, death or other loss caused directly or indirectly, wholly or partly, by bodily or mental infirmity ... or by any other kind of disease . . .…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Goldston v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Solomon v. . Continental Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Patterson v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. International Harvester Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Segal v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Hough v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. City of Chicago v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API