Adair v. Compton

MARVIN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the rejection of his demand for reformation of a deed of mineral royalty to him by the defendant in each of these consolidated cases. For the reasons we assign, we affirm.

Each royalty deed was prepared and mailed with one or more appropriate bank drafts by plaintiff to the defendant-grant- or. Except for the name of grantor and property description, the deeds were identical. Each deed recited:

“The royalty interests and rights herein sold . . . are:

“One-half (V2) of Grantor’s royalty . to be produced from lands above described, . . . ”1

Each bank draft…