Interest of M.R., a Child

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] G.L. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights. He argues the juvenile court-erred by declaring him in default, finding the conditions and causes of the child’s deprivation were likely to continue, and determining the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) did not apply. We affirm the juvenile court’s order.

I

' [¶2] M.R., the child at issue, was placed in the custody of social services due to concerns that her mother was unfit to care for her. After the child was placed into custody, a social' services employee petitioned for termination of parental…